![]()
We would however keep an open mind and keen interest in the ongoing development of Strawberry Perl.įor the most part, our Windows-based customers continued to opt for our recommendation of ActivePerl. #Activeperl vs strawberry install#Some Perl modules were also not fully supported or failed to install easily/correctly in Strawberry Perl.Īs such, because we continued to only recommend ActivePerl to Windows customers, it was logical to continue to develop under ActivePerl ourselves. Strawberry Perl was still the newcomer and felt a bit “rough around the edges”. ![]() Consequently, a graphical Windows application which allowed easy installation of Perl modules was preferable.Īnother difference was that ActivePerl was established and more stable. On Linux-based servers, installing modules via the command line is the norm, but many of Windows-based users were less familiar with command line use. Rather, Perl modules required installation via the command line. When we first evaluated the newcomer Strawberry Perl in 2008 against the more established ActivePerl, differences became clear from an ease of installation and use perspective.įirstly, Strawberry Perl didn’t include a visual “Perl Package Manager”-type tool for installing and maintaining Perl modules. What initially made ActivePerl better than Strawberry Perl? After evaluating Strawberry Perl, we decided ActivePerl would continue to be the Perl distribution we developed under and would recommend to our Windows-based customers. Perhaps the most notable of these being “ Strawberry Perl“, which first appeared in 2008.īack then we explored what Strawberry Perl had to offer when compared to ActivePerl. Since 2005, other Perl distributions built for Windows have come along. Therefore, we would recommend ActivePerl due to its availability, regular updates, and ease of use. #Activeperl vs strawberry software#Many of our “self hosted” customers intended to install our MIDAS booking software on their Windows-based server. The PPM tool allowed easy and quick installation of any such modules as required. MIDAS requires some additional modules not included within the standard ActivePerl distribution. It provided a graphical interface where modules could be quickly installed, updated, or uninstalled with just a few clicks:ĪctivePerl included a number of “default” Perl modules. This made installing and updating Perl modules easy. Secondly ActivePerl came with a handy tool called the “Perl Package Manager” (PPM). #Activeperl vs strawberry free#The reason we liked ActivePerl was two-fold firstly, a completely free “Community Edition” was available. This was a Perl distribution named “ ActivePerl“, produced by ActiveState. When MIDAS development started back in 2005, there was really only one mainstream solution for running Perl on Windows. This means that we needed to install a Perl distribution on Windows. Our in-house development of MIDAS is primarily within a Windows-based environment. We test MIDAS on a range of operating systems, servers and platforms. #Activeperl vs strawberry mac os#Most Linux and Mac OS based operating systems come with Perl pre-installed, yet, Windows operating systems do not. It certainly makes it more imperative to make sure that we can use PLV8 on Windows.“ Perl” is the coding language we develop our web based room booking and resource scheduling software, MIDAS, in. ![]() I'm not sure what I'll recommend they use instead. Build up a community's dependence on what you give them, and then start charging them for it.įor the time being I will be advising clients on Windows to steer clear of PLPerl for Postgres. To say I'm annoyed would be understating it considerably. I guess ActiveState have the right to do this, strictly speaking, but it's a dick move nevertheless. And don't tell me Strawberry Perl - last time I looked it didn't work well, and anyway most people don't want to have to install whole development environment just to get Perl. So now we need a decent free-as-in-beer and free-as-in-free Perl distribution for Windows. #Activeperl vs strawberry license#To use ActivePerl in production, you must now have a supported Business or Enterprise Edition license we continue to provide the latest versions free for development and testing use. To be better equipped to answer support questions, particularly for customers using ActivePerl in production, we have changed the licensing terms of Community Edition. I have just received an email from ActiveState which contains the following: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |